Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Grey Wolf's column >>

GREY WOLF

Home Page
Rabid
Articles Posted: 15  Links Seeded: 552
Member Since: 10/2006  Last Seen: 5/18/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Occupy Pensacola: Alleged "Conservatives" Better Wake Up

Seeded on Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:42 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: market-ticker.org
us-news, tea-party, conservatives, libertarian, occupy, okaloosa-county-libertarian-party
Seeded by Grey Wolf
Advertise | AdChoices

Today I traveled to Occupy Pensacola.  Yes, folks, it's spreading.  I went for two reasons: I wanted to see this so-called progressive stack in action that I had heard was all the rage (and was basically reverse-discrimination) and I also was very interested in seeing what the composition of the crowd was like.  Full disclosure: I went with two officers of the Okaloosa County Libertarian Party, and we had signs too.

Well, here's one of the first people I ran into:

Hmmm... that doesn't look much like a young dope-smoking hippie -- or a communist for that matter -- does it?

 

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Grey Wolf's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: Activism, Corporate Personhood, EconVine, Free Thinkers, Happy with Corporate America?, Heated Debate, Left of Center, MSM Incinerator, Political Analysis, Psych, Soc, Philos
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (21)
Grey Wolf

Nice report … from a Tea Party leader!

  • 4 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 7:36 AM EDT
cowboygrandpa

While I may not agree with whole report. I find that I am in agreeance with those who want work here in America, who want Congress to be of the people, by the people and for the people -instead of; of the wealthy, for the wealthy, and by the wealthy-, that greed is our number problem in putting in the laws for controlling the outright destructiveness of the Capitalism we practice, and for the fact that it is noy just the young who are protesting these things.

I resemble the guy with the grey beard and hat- around that age group- yes I'm concerned for my wife and myself, but I'm more concerned for my children and grandchildren.

Good seed Grey Wolf.

  • 3 votes
#1.1 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 2:08 PM EDT
o'stephanie

Excellent see, Grey Wolf!

I was very interested in this article because Pensacola is the same size as my town Corvallis. This looks like the same people who show up at our demonstrations.

This article shows the worth of going to see for yourself rather than trusting to the corporate media. I did notice that he began the article looking at "them" and at the end, he was identifying himself as one of the group.

Excellent!

  • 2 votes
#1.2 - Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:20 AM EDT
Reply
JohnRussell

I went by the Occupy Chicago 'headquarters' the other day ( the corner of Jackson and La Salle Sts.) and there were about 50 people there. I looked at all of them, and I would say one or two appeared to be over the age of 30.

    Reply#2 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:05 AM EDT
    o'stephanie

    And, being under thirty, how did they look? Did they look unemployed? Did they look like they had no future?

    Pensacola nd my town are the same size and looks like we have the same sort of people showing up. Just Americans...

    • 1 vote
    #2.1 - Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:23 AM EDT
    Reply
    Linda-3523748

    That saying comes to mind. A picture is worth a thousand words. This is the most powerful defense of the protestors that could ever be written isnt it? It makes it so painfully clear what the truth of the situation.

    • 8 votes
    Reply#3 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:19 AM EDT
    Grey Wolf

    "it so painfully clear"

    yeah, the right and left are sometimes complaining about the same things ...

    • 6 votes
    #3.1 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:48 AM EDT
    Mike-1499840

    Linda,

    You may have missed then teaching point ma'am. If all the protestors were dorting themselves as are the ones in Pensacoloa, then more people would be more prone to give them some credibility. I am disinclined to give those boneheads in NYC the time of day until they quit living like pigs, defecating on police cars and quit violating other people's property rights.

    The folks in Pensacola, from what I see in this article, I would be happy to have a conversation with them.

    Regards,

    Mike

    • 2 votes
    #3.2 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:09 AM EDT
    Mike-1499840

    dorting

    Should be "deporting."

    • 1 vote
    #3.3 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:11 AM EDT
    Ron in CT

    dorting

    Should be "deporting."

    Should be "comporting".

    com·port/kəmˈpôrt/

    Verb:

    1. Conduct oneself; behave.
    2. Accord with; agree with.

    yeah, the right and left are sometimes complaining about the same things ...

    The problem being, they are juxtaposed on how to rectify the same issues. The right wants to continue with the failed policy of trickle down economics, blame the government and set up a laissez-faire economic structure which would rely on the good will of the rich and powerful to safeguard the public well being, while the left would like the rich and powerful to pay their full share and use that to safeguard the public well being. The question is; do you think that business and those that most profit from it, will look out for anything other than profits? I think that has already been answered many times over, NO.

    • 3 votes
    #3.4 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:27 AM EDT
    Grey Wolf

    "'The problem being, they are juxtaposed on how to rectify the same issues."

    touché

    • 1 vote
    #3.5 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:30 AM EDT
    Starseeker

    do you think that business and those that most profit from it, will look out for anything other than profits?

    This is where the role of government in setting policy should act to create policies conducive to the desired outcome rather than attempting to micromanage the situation and forcing an outcome.

    hypothetically if everyone had the exact same income would there be equality or would there still be complaints that some group has an unfair advantage. I think there would. no.

    As we have seen the problem is global and it seems that some entity {unknown to me} agreed on globalization and this is good for some and bad for others. Policies that steer the actions and behavior of corporations to a better outcome is where I believe the solution is. The US system was the best of all history and it seems to have gone too far in one direction and I believe it can be corrected without abandoning it completely.

    • 2 votes
    #3.6 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:53 AM EDT
    Ron in CT

    I would, in theory agree. The form of capitalism that has always worked best for this country includes a large dose of socialism. Ideally, purposefully and effectively regulated business and a healthy, happy, well compensated workforce makes for the best form of capitalism in this country. One where everyone feels, rightly or not, that they have the ability to move up the social ladder. This had been the compact between business and workers since the 50's and built a strong, happy middle class. That is up until the early 80's when Reaganomics started to work is evil spell on the working class. Borrow large sums of money from the workers( Payroll tax), pass it back to the wealthy and big business(tax loopholes and the reduced tax rate of the capital gains tax) and let them do as they will with the workers, dismantle collective bargaining agreements, restrict organizing, cut or stagnate wages, cut benefits, eliminate company retirement packages and now cut social safety nets. All of which gives you a workforce that is willing to work for whatever you pay them without any type of retirement possibly or liability to the employer. The Conservative utopia, abundant cheap labor, no social compact, no shared liability (bailouts) and a free reign in political spending.

    • 2 votes
    #3.7 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:12 AM EDT
    Starseeker

    I humbly disagree with you and you have outlined several areas where policy changes can impact our direction which brings us back to OWS and what they might be about. Policy change will get us on the right course more quickly than any other solution I can envision. I don't know what OWS will result in or how it will get there. However, if economic equity and stability is restored by policy change then it would seem OWS would be satisfied. Politicians appear to be waking to the idea that they may be able to deliver but they still need more encouragement/goading/OWSing.

    • 1 vote
    #3.8 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:23 AM EDT
    Ron in CT

    In order for policy to be changed, legislation must be passed. By the right refusing to do their jobs, compromise and pass legislation that both sides can stomach, the right has effectively stopped the growth of the economy, stopped the progression of democracy and screwed every American not part of the 1%.

    • 2 votes
    #3.9 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:57 AM EDT
    Starseeker

    Restricting Visas is another area where some attention needs to be paid because this along with Globalization and Extraction is undermining the conditions. Arguably its part and parcel of Globalization but again a simple policy change would go a long way to balancing the playing filed.

    Case: offshoring by itself was failing however when an offshore resource is issued a visa and is installed in a position to interface with the offshore team their success increases substantially.

    • 1 vote
    #3.10 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:15 AM EDT
    Starseeker

    Ron, I get your bias...

    OWS is attempting to drive change although they seem to be all over the place on what that is. People can drive change though through concerted effort and pressure on or replacement of the elected officials to enact the policy change needed.

    I don't really want to engage in defining or speculating your solution for you although you seem to be implying OWS has no chance of succeeding.

    • 1 vote
    #3.11 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:23 AM EDT
    Ron in CT

    Again, in theory I agree. However that is against the laissez-faire economic template the right wants to install. When profit is the sole driving factor in business, then it is only logical to send jobs to those that will take the least for their labor. What I would suggest, other than addressing the immigration issue, is stop giving tax breaks to those that outsource. Stop giving tax breaks to those that set up their businesses in offshore states to avoid US tax. Stop excluding money made overseas by US companies from taxation. Stop giving subsidies to those that take our national resources off shore and then sell them back to us. Stop making it more profitable take the jobs away from US workers by addressing the tax issues, hit them where it makes them listen, in the pocketbook.

    • 1 vote
    #3.12 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:28 AM EDT
    Ron in CT

    On the contrary, I hope they do succeed. I am a proponent of their ideals. I think government has allowed business to dictate policy and have gained undue and unwarranted influence over those of us that work for a living, not just draw dividends from investment. However I do not think that there is any way that change can happen unless legislation is passed, that seems in doubt given the current crop of GOPT thugs in congress. The 1% runs this government and has hold on both parties, even if it is not equally. The only way to level the playing field is to take public money out of politics, but that is a hard sell. Kinda like a crack addict trying to quit, they may want to, need to and plan to, but it seldom happens.

      #3.13 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 2:56 PM EDT
      Reply
      Starseeker

      I thought OWS was apolitical in terms of D/R despite some recent efforts to politicize and or co-opt the movement. I think keeping it that way would help a lot. The recent global outbreaks may help in that regard but its not certain. Fraud is not exclusive to D/R-P,L,C and neither is the required integrity to keep anyone from going to the darkside.

      Regardless of political affiliation there are certain principals that must be universal and those are what have been abused but this is where common ground can be reestablished. The Constitutional amendment now advocated by Ratigan is not required to achieve the desired results but a united effort is needed to clean and purge to regain control of elected officials by and for the people.

      Globalization and Extraction are essential elements of change that are needed in "policy" along with a keen focus on "integrity" in businesses and governments. These make the pillars on which the US can get on the course to correction. However, the financial damage that has been done globally (which is still unfolding) will take some decades to heal and that is an unfortunate reality which will challenge our resolve to stay the course in the face of continuing disappointing results.

      • 2 votes
      Reply#4 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 8:59 AM EDT
      Grey Wolf

      "I thought OWS was apolitical in terms of D/R …"

      well, i guess this is a libertarian [TP] mocking his frequent ally, the R's [media] and their stereotyping of the OWS supporters … so i shouldn't have jumped to the "right and left" language above.

      (nice comment, by-the-way)

      • 2 votes
      #4.1 - Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:12 AM EDT
      Reply
      Leave a Comment:
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
      Newsvine Privacy Statement
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
      FUN STUFF:
      • Leaderboard |
      • E-Mail Alerts |
      • Top of the Vine |
      • Newsvine Live |
      • Newsvine Archives |
      • The Greenhouse |
      COMPANY STUFF:
      • Code of Honor |
      • Company Info |
      • Contact Us |
      • Jobs |
      • User Agreement |
      • Privacy Policy |
      • About our ads
      LEGAL STUFF:
      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com